Go Back  DoItYourself.com Community Forums > Interior Improvement Center > Framing, Flooring and Sub-Flooring
Reload this Page >

Cathedral ceiling: is this partition wall load bearing?

Cathedral ceiling: is this partition wall load bearing?

Reply

  #1  
Old 02-14-16, 06:41 PM
T
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8
Received 0 Votes on 0 Posts
Cathedral ceiling: is this partition wall load bearing?

We are looking to do some renos and are trying to determine if this wall is load bearing. As the title states the room this wall is in has a cathedral ceiling. The wall in question is dead center in the room, directly under the middle of the ceiling. In the basement below this room is a main beam that carries the load of the floor joists, and runs parallel with the wall, and pretty much directly underneath it. My guess is this wall is load bearing, but I am not sure how cathedral ceilings are designed. Here are a few pics for reference.

First, an overhead view of the room.
Name:  overhead.gif
Views: 2802
Size:  26.8 KB

Here is the wall in question.
Name:  wall.jpg
Views: 4024
Size:  23.5 KB

Another view, which shows what appears to be a fake beam?
Name:  beam.jpg
Views: 2830
Size:  21.6 KB

Closer shot of the fake beam
Name:  fake.jpg
Views: 2580
Size:  31.8 KB
 
Attached Images  
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 02-14-16, 07:09 PM
C
Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,138
Received 2 Votes on 2 Posts
Pretty good chance that it is. With a cathedral ceiling there are no joists or rafter ties to resist the outward force on the side walls from the force of the roof. So the ridge beam must be supported (a "structural ridge") to prevent the weight of the roof from pressing outward on the walls.

Sometimes a very long structural ridge beam is used that is only supported at the ends, and you may have such a beam. But because you have that nice wall right under the ridge and right in the middle of the span, I wouldn't be surprised if the ridge beam is supported in the middle with built up posts that carry load down to the beam in the basement. That allows the ridge beam to be smaller and the supporting structures at the ends to be smaller.

It's not going to be easy to be sure which way it was done. If you have plans (they may be on file at the building dept.) it would certainly show this. You may be able to see evidence of the vertical post from the basement (but not likely because of the subfloor). Last resort would be to remove a strip of drywall from one side of that center wall so you can see structure inside.

IIWM, I'd want an engineers opinion before I'd plan on any demo.
 
  #3  
Old 02-14-16, 07:36 PM
Handyone's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: U.S.
Posts: 5,450
Received 0 Votes on 0 Posts
If your roof overhang consists of 2x4 tails 24" on center, then you have scissor trusses.

If your rafter tails are larger, like 2x6 or 2x8, that's a bad sign for removing any walls.
 
  #4  
Old 02-15-16, 07:38 AM
T
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8
Received 0 Votes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys. I will investigate further with the information you've given me.
 
Reply
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
 
Ask a Question
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: